Want More?
This report is for members and pay-per-view purchase only.
Member-only content

CFL and LED lamps review

CFLs are now common in most homes, but LEDs are beginning to move in.
 
Get access to all CHOICE BENEFITS
$1.91/wk
*Billed quarterly
 
 
 
  • Updated:27 Apr 2012
  • Author:Chris Barnes
  • rateraterateraterate: Member rating
 

01.Introduction

Our tester James and CFLs testing

We review 14 "warm white" CFLs plus one LED lamp, with our latest test revealing that one of the cheapest lamps on the market is also one of the best overall performers.

Our current batch of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) and LEDs has now been on test for 6000 hours. That’s the equivalent of over three years use, assuming five hours usage per day. We last reported on them at the 2000 hour mark in November 2011 and unsurprisingly the best and worst performers are much the same now as then.

Apart from the Philips LED bulb, we have now retired this batch of lamps, even though many claim longer lifespans than 6000 hours. Previous tests indicate that the top performers are likely to still be OK after 8000 or 10000 hours use, though they will have dimmed a bit more. 

It doesn’t seem that long ago that compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) took over from the traditional incandescent lightbulb, helped of course by government energy efficiency regulations that largely relegated incandescents to history. But our next test will include several LED lamps alongside the CFLs, as LED lamps are now appearing in greater numbers in the market.

Long-life lamps

CFLs are energy-efficient and long lasting, but they aren’t without their problems:

  • They can be slow to warm up to full brightness
  • They are generally bigger than equivalent incandescents so they don’t suit all light fittings
  • And last but far from least, they contain mercury

Enter the light-emitting diode, or LED. They’ve been commonly available for years in bicycle lights, torches, garden lights and other applications, and are also available as downlights. They're very energy-efficient, can be very bright and don't contain mercury.

Most LED general lighting service lamps now available are relatively low-light output – comparable to a 25W or 40W incandescent – but brighter 60W equivalent models are beginning to appear. We’ve included one in this test: the Philips Master LEDbulb and will include more in future tests.

For more information about Saving energy, see Energy and water.

CHOICE's experts independently test a wide range of products and services to bring you unbiased reviews, product comparison tools and buying advice that is trusted by 140,000+ members.
Get access to all
CHOICE benefits.
$1.91
/week
*Billed quarterly
Purchase this
single report.

$5

How does CHOICE test compact fluorescent lamps?

2010_02_hwt_cfls


See more videos like this.


Models tested

  • Black and Gold BG15W-1E
  • Coles Mini Compact Spiral Lamp V04492/ EEMSES-15
  • GE FLE15GLS/T3/827/E27
  • Lightstar GLS 25605
  • Lightstar GLS 25606
  • Megaman Compact Classic GSU115i-ES-27K
  • Megaman GK715d
  • Nelson Dimmable MELSD15BC
  • Nelson Little Greenie Energy Saver MELTG15ES
  • Osram Duluxstar Twist 13W/827
  • Osram Micro Twist 14W/865 E27
  • Philips MASTER LEDlamp MV dimmable 12W
  • SPARSAM Low Energy Lamp 30149453
  • Sylvania Mini-Lynx Twister 615223
  • Woolworths Essentials FE-11SB-14W

Previously tested models (results here)

  • Envirolux Lucci 8000hr
  • GE FLE15HLX/827/B22/T2
  • GE FLE15TBX/827/E27/T3
  • Lightstar CFL3
  • Megaman Zenia Tubular WL1514
  • Mirabella EEMSES-15
  • Mirabella EEU-15
  • Nelson Aladdin Mini MELQAL15BCS
  • Nelson Aladdin Mini MELQAL15ESS
  • Osram Dulux EL Longlife 15W/827
  • Osram Duluxstar Minitwist 13W/827 
  • Philips Ambiance AMB14WWWES
  • Philips Genie GENIE14WWWES
  • Philips Tornado TND12WWWBC
  • Woolworths Essentials N3UN15

The drawbacks of CFLs

The environmental benefit of the phase-out of inefficient lighting has been widely publicised, but CFLs aren’t without impact — they use more energy to produce and contain mercury, which could spell problems if it’s not recycled. So what’s our overall verdict? 

A life cycle analysis of CFLs published in The Environmental Engineer concluded that CFLs are the better choice for the environment, mainly because they use electricity much more efficiently. As for the mercury they release at the end of their life, the analysis found that the production of incandescent lamps contributes five times more mercury from burning coal for electricity. This was even the case in Tasmania, where hydroelectricity dominates, although involving much smaller quantities.

Environment groups are generally supportive of the initiative overall. “CFLs are not completely green in every way, but on balance they have a much lower impact than incandescents,” according to the Australian Conservation Foundation.

Incandescent lamps

Since November 2009, incandescent bulbs (apart from a few specialised sizes and types) have not been available for sale in Australia as part of the government’s drive to reduce energy consumption and lessen the impact of electricity production on the environment and economy. They have been replaced by CFLs in most domestic lighting applications.

Early CFLs, which CHOICE first tested back in 2000, cost up to $20 or more and were slow to warm up to full brightness. Now, they're cheaper to buy – typically about $5-$10 per lamp – and run; they're also faster to warm up and have fewer failures.

Incandescents are still available in very small sizes, but will be phased out as CFLs and LEDs in these sizes become available.

Note: most people probably still refer to CFLs and incandescents as "light bulbs", and think of a "lamp" as the light fitting on their bedside table. In fact, as pointed out by CHOICE members in the comments, "lamp" is the technically correct term for what we used to call light bulbs, and the report uses this term accordingly.

Did you know?

  • Up to 90% of the energy an incandescent (standard) lamp uses is wasted, mainly on heat.
  • Lighting represents about 12% of Australia’s domestic greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Globally, electric lighting generates emissions equal to 70% of those from all passenger vehicles.

Phase-out of incandescent bulbs

The federal government’s incandescent light bulb phase-out program applies Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) to lighting products. Products that don’t meet MEPS will be restricted from sale.

  • Tungsten filament incandescent general lighting service (GLS) light bulbs (the typical pear-shaped bulbs used in most domestic light fittings) don’t meet MEPS and have not been available in stores since November 2009.
  • Since October 2010, MEPS have applied to >40W candle, fancy round and decorative lamps, mains voltage halogen non-reflectors and extra-low voltage (ELV) halogen reflectors.
  • From October 2012, MEPS will apply to mains voltage reflector lamps, including halogen (PAR, ER, R, etc), and >25W candle fancy round and decorative lamps.
    Depending on when efficient alternatives become available, pilot lamps 25W and below will also be subject to MEPS.

How do they work?

Incandescent bulbs work by passing an electric current through a metal filament, making it white-hot so it gives off light. They’re simple and cheap to manufacture but inefficient to run; most of the electrical energy is converted into heat rather than light. 

CFLs pass a current through a mixture of gases in a tube, causing the gases to emit UV radiation, which makes the phosphor coating on the inside of the tube glow (or fluoresce). This process is much more energy-efficient; it uses only about 20%-25% of the electricity needed to light an equivalently bright incandescent bulb.

Want more?
Get access to our independent testing reports and save yourself time and money.
 
 

 
 
Your say - Choice voice

Make a Comment

Members – Sign in on the top right to contribute to comments