Breakfast cereal review

CHOICE finds most cereals still have too much sugar to be considered healthy.
 
Get access to all CHOICE BENEFITS
$1.91/wk
*Billed quarterly
 
 
 
  • Updated:23 Dec 2010
  • Author:Rebecca Gatto
  • rateraterateraterate: Member rating
 

01.Introduction

Breakfast bowl being filled with sugar

Many ready-to-eat breakfast cereals, especially those marketed to children, contain alarming levels of sugar – so much so that they really belong in the confectionery aisle. Yet often their manufacturers hide behind vitamins and minerals health claims, that mask the cereal’s serious nutritional shortcomings.

CHOICE analysed the nutritional value of 166 ready-to-eat breakfast cereals found in major supermarkets. The good news is, since our last review in 2009 the amount of cereals in the the very high-fibre category has increased. What hasn’t changed, however, is the fact that too many cereals contain far too much sugar and salt.

CHOICE wants tougher labelling laws so that manufacturers can't sugar-coat cereals with claims about nutrition content and health benefits that don’t give a true reflection of how healthy a food is. For example, if a low-fibre cereal is packed full of added sugars and high in salt, it shouldn’t be able to claim that it has ‘protein for muscle development’ and ‘calcium for strong bones’. Cereals targeting children seem to be the worst offenders.

Are food manufacturers misleading us with too much information?

Traffic light labelling


 
 

 
 
 

How to comment

Here's your chance to join in the debate. Just click in the comment box and let the CHOICE Community know what you think, or view all of the comments on this article.

Reporting offensive comments

If you see something offensive or something that just shouldn't be there, hit the report button and let us know immediately. View the Terms of use for user comments.

 

Make a Comment