Searching for the worst banks just got better


CHOICE says improvements to Ombudsman data a good start

CHOICE says the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has made welcome improvements to its complaints data, making it easier to identify the worst performers.

The new data allows online comparisons of different products and financial services providers, and is based on the more than 30,000 disputes received by the FOS in 2010-11 – up 27 per cent from the previous year.

“The Ombudsman deserves credit for making it easier to find the worst offenders among financial institutions, including through searching by product category”, says director of campaigns and communications Christopher Zinn.

“These are improvements that CHOICE has been calling for through our Better Banking Campaign, and we are asking the FOS to go further in making this information more regular, comprehensive and easier for consumers to understand.”

CHOICE believes that instead of annual figures, the FOS should publish at least quarterly ‘league tables’ of how financial services providers are performing.

It should also be a requirement that the FOS and ASIC jointly publish searchable complaints data received by the banks themselves, not just the Ombudsman.

“While this is a step forward, the data still requires a high degree of financial literacy to wade through – and the average consumer is unlikely to be using a glossary to figure out which bank has the worst track record on complaints,” says Mr Zinn.

CHOICE says the value of the new format is already apparent from today’s figures, with one of the key findings that NAB has a stand out chance against the ‘big four’ banks of attracting complaints about consumer loans such as mortgages.

The figures show that NAB customers have a 67 in 100,000 chance of taking a dispute on consumer loans to FOS compared with 44 for Westpac, 42 for the CBA and 27 for the ANZ.

“Our most recent bank satisfaction survey told us that many consumers find switching banks relatively easy provided they know how to get a better deal, and information like this helps cut through the industry spin,” says Mr Zinn.

You can read more about CHOICE’s 2011 bank satisfaction survey

Media inquiries:

Christopher Zinn, CHOICE, Director of Campaigns and Communications: 0425 296 442

Related articles

Related tags:
 
 

Bank Satisfaction Survey 2011

This year's survey shows the big four banks have not lifted their game since our 2010 report.

2 Dec 2011 | Most participants in our survey have long-term relationships with one of the big four banks, but the loyalty has yielded very little satisfaction.

Bank satisfaction survey 2010

The Big Four again rank bottom for customer satisfaction, but we found they are quite open to giving discounted rates - when asked.

1 Sep 2010 | If you're not getting an interest rate saving of at least 0.7% then you're probably paying too much.

 

Bank satisfaction survey 2009

So which institutions came out on top for bank accounts, credit cards and homeloans in our survey?

30 Sep 2009 | Over the past year, ANZ, Commonwealth, NAB and Westpac have increased market share but our survey reveals they haven't increased in popularity.

Better banking within reach says CHOICE

3 Mar 2011 | A new CHOICE report sets out the practical steps banks can take within the next 12 months to herald a new consumer friendly age of banking.

 

You can't bank on satisfaction with the big four

5 Dec 2011 | CHOICE’s bank satisfaction survey has found the big four banks rank far below credit unions and online banks, with customer service the main bone of contention.

 

Sign up to our free
e-Newsletter

Receive FREE email updates of our latest tests, consumer news and CHOICE marketing promotions.