Move to stamp out dodgy nutrition claims creates big fat loophole


A good start on fat claims but there's room for improvement

CHOICE has welcomed a proposal to crack down on ‘fat free’ and ‘percentage fat free’ claims on unhealthy products but the people’s watchdog says the proposed rules must extend to all fat content claims on food labels to avoid creating a big fat loophole.

The rules proposed in a Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) consultation on health and nutrition claims would mean that manufacturers prevented from making a ‘percentage fat free’ claim could re-word the claim to ‘percentage fat’ to avoid  regulatory oversight. 

“CHOICE is particularly concerned that under the current proposal, a product would have to meet nutrition criteria to claim ‘99% fat-free’ but would have no restrictions about claiming ‘1% fat’. That would be a strange outcome,” says CHOICE spokesperson, Ingrid Just.

CHOICE launched a major campaign against dodgy health and nutrition claims in late 2011, compiling the ‘Wall of Shame’ to show how these claims are used selectively to highlight healthy attributes of products with high levels of saturated fat, sugars and sodium.

“We applaud ministers for moving to crack down on ‘fat free’ and ‘percentage fat free’ claims as there is clear evidence that this marketing spin is used selectively and makes healthy choices more difficult for Australian shoppers,” says Ms Just.

“But the risk is that by ignoring percentage fat claims such as 1% fat, along with similar claims like ‘low-fat’, ‘reduced fat’ and ‘less fat than,’ we create a big fat loophole that could undermine this long-overdue move.”

CHOICE is calling on food and health ministers to expand the proposed regulations to all fat content claims and commit to reviewing these measures with the option of extending regulation to all nutrition claims.  

“It’s time we knocked the healthy halo off these unhealthy products and allowed consumers to make easy, informed decisions about the food they eat every day,” says Ms Just.

-End-

Media contact:  Ingrid Just, CHOICE, Head of Media and Spokesperson: 0430 172 669

Related articles

Related tags:
 
 

CHOICE guide to food labelling

You can't judge a book by its cover – what about food by its label?

20 Jan 2009 | Food labelling can be a minefield of confusion and misinformation. Labelling legislation offers some relief, but often isn't sufficiently enforced.

Truth in food labelling

Nutrition claims on food labels often don't tell the full story.

15 Sep 2011 | Seductive labels on food that promise less saturated fat, no added sugar or a bumper amount of wholegrains often don't tell the whole nutritional story.

 

Traffic light labelling needs green light

New research shows traffic light labels help consumers make healthy choices.

19 Sep 2008 | A colour-coded traffic lights system, first developed by the UK Food Standards Agency, has been suggested as a more useful tool for helping consumers to make healthier food choices.

 

Sign up to our free
e-Newsletter

Receive FREE email updates of our latest tests, consumer news and CHOICE marketing promotions.