Smoke alarm reviews

We test 15 battery-powered smoke alarms, including photoelectric, ionisation and dual-sensor models.
Learn more


The following models scored the best results in our test.

What to buy
Brand Price
First Alert SA302CNAUS Ultimate Dual Sensor $65
Kidde PI9000 Dual Sensor $80
First Alert SA710CNAUS (photoelectric) $30

Smoke Alarms
Brand / model (in rank order)Overall score (%)Smouldering score (%)Flaming score (%)Ease of use (%)Hush buttonInterconnectableOtherTypePrice ($)
First Alert SA302CNAUS Ultimate Dual Sensor
86 87 90 60 yes no Remote controlled silence/test Dual 65
Kidde PI9000 Dual Sensor
84 97 77 60 yes no   Dual 80
First Alert SA710CNAUS
83 93 78 60 no no   Photoelectric 30
Worth considering
Fire Smart FS0916
77 94 69 40 no no   Photoelectric 18
Family Gard FG888DCAUS
76 66 87 70 no no   Ionisation 15
Brooks PFS3105TYCH
76 84 62 100 no yes 10-year lithium battery Photoelectric 76
Quell SA1000
76 86 75 40 no no   Photoelectric 30
Wormald WRS001PH
68 72 71 40 no no   Photoelectric 34
Not recommended
Lifesaver 1925
57 22 85 90 no no   Ionisation 27
Brooks PFS100TY
52 19 75 100 yes yes 10-year lithium battery Ionisation 58
HPM D45/2
52 26 74 70 no no   Ionisation 30
Kidde 0915CAUS Bedroom
50 10 80 90 no no   Ionisation 22
Wormald WRS109MK2 twin pack
46 3 77 100 no no   Ionisation 20
Fire Sentry SS168
45 8 78 60 no no   Ionisation 9
Quell SA702
43 3 79 60 yes no Exit light Ionisation 33

Table notes

# Discontinued model.

Recommended These models quickly detect smouldering fires, typically when the smoke obscuration is only 7% or less, and are also fast at detecting flaming fires. The dual sensor models contain both ionisation and photoelectric sensors.

Worth considering These models are all activate while the amount of smoke is fairly low, although not as consistently well as the recommended models. The Family Gard FG888DCAUS is the only ionisation model worth considering as it detected smouldering fires fast enough in most cases, but not as fast as the photoelectrics. If you buy this model, also install at least one photoelectric alarm for peace of mind.

Not recommended These models are not recommended due to their relatively poor performance in smouldering fires. If you only have one smoke alarm in your home, these (or any other ionisation model) should not be your first choice. However, if you have photoelectric alarms installed and want an additional safeguard against fast-flaming fires, these models are suitable.

Using the table

Scores The overall score is made up of:

  • Smouldering fire score: 45%
  • Flaming fire score: 45%
  • Ease of use: 10%

The smouldering and flaming fire scores are based on the level of smoke obscuration at the time the alarm activated. The heavier the smoke obscuration, the lower the score. If the obscuration was 50% (very thick smoke), the alarm scored zero. High scores in either of these tests indicate the alarm activated when the smoke was still very light; visibility would be very good in these cases and you'd be able to easily find your way out of the house, or even have time to fight the fire if it was safe to do so.  

Features See What to look for for details.

Price Recommended retail as at February 2010. 

How we test

The smoke alarms are tested by an expert fire laboratory. A fire is started in a room with a smoke alarm positioned on the ceiling of an adjacent hallway, connected by an open doorway. The temperature, time of activation and level of smoke obscuration in the hallway are electronically logged.

Smoke obscuration is the key factor. Obscuration of 100% per metre means only one metre of visibility; you’d barely see your outstretched hand. The Australian Standard for smoke alarms requires photoelectric alarms to activate before obscuration gets worse than 20% per metre. Performance criteria for ionisation alarms are different.

We test with two types of fires:

  • Flaming fires Dry timber is set alight, producing flames quickly but initially with relatively little smoke.
  • Smouldering fires Polyurethane foam (commonly used in furniture) is placed over a hot soldering iron. Such fires can smoulder for a long time, gradually producing more and more smoke, before bursting into flames. If these fires occur at night, you can inhale their toxic smoke while sleeping, which makes waking – and escape – more difficult. Smoke inhalation is a major cause of death in fatal household fires.

Ease of use Our tester also assesses how easy it is to push each alarm’s test button, including the force required, how long the test takes to activate, and whether the button can be easily pressed with a broom handle (important if the alarm is mounted on a ceiling).

Susceptibility to nuisance alarms Even though this is a common complaint about smoke alarms, it’s difficult to test this properly so we reluctantly excluded this aspect from testing. Ionisation models are generally more prone to nuisance alarms than photoelectrics, particularly from cooking fumes. Steam can also cause nuisance alarms. 

CHOICE verdict

Photoelectric and dual sensor alarms are the best all-round performers. All the alarms tested respond fast enough to flaming fires, so our recommendations are based on their responses to smouldering fires. In this test, the dual sensor and photoelectric models clearly outperform the ionisation models. Most of the ionisation models are a little faster at detecting flaming fires, but not enough to outweigh their poor performance in smouldering fires.

There are many more models of smoke alarm on the market than we were able to test. But whichever you choose, make sure at least some are photoelectric or dual sensor models.


Sign up to our free

Receive FREE email updates of our latest tests, consumer news and CHOICE marketing promotions.

Your say - Choice voice

Make a Comment

Members – Sign in on the top right to contribute to comments