
Updating
comparison table
Compare products
USING THE TABLE
Price paid: in November 2010.
Performance
Based on the average recorded time for read and write tests, using 5.1GB of multiple files (various sizes).
Specifications
Dimensions, the size of the device, rounded up to the nearest millimetre (mm); Weight, the mass of the device, rounded up to the nearest gram (g); Stated Capacity, the stated capacity of the device (GB); Usable capacity, the capacity available under Windows (GB); Default file system, all portable storage devices in this test featured the FAT32 file system by default. Ruggedised, specifically designed to reliably operate in harsh usage environments and conditions.
TABLE NOTES
:
[A] All performance tests were conducted using the FAT32 file system. Performance ranking was based on using results of testing using the USB 2.0 connection. Overall Score is weighted equally between read and write tests.
[B] Usable capacity is determined after attaching the devices to the test system (running Win 7 Professional 64-bit), straight out of the box. Some may have different capacities due to the included software and formatting.
[C] The only device with a USB 3.0 interface. It was tested using both USB 2.0 and USB 3.0, but the performance score was derived from the USB 2.0 results. USB 3.0 timings are included to show the difference between the interface types.
[D] Definitions of Lifetime may vary, check the documentation wording carefully.