The results and what they tell us
The bad news is that none of the shampoos performed particularly well and
not one earned an overall "great" or "good" rating.
- 24 brands rated "it's a start"
- 35 were given a "not good enough" rating
- Toni &
Guy, Alpecin and O&M were rated "we avoid" because they had either
limited or no publicly available information on their practices.
Good On You founder Gordon Renouf says it's expected that a majority of
brands will do either little more than what's legally required, or only
address the issues that are very high in the public consciousness such as
animal testing and/or chemical issues.
When it comes to environmental and animal issues, there's a wide
spread of results.
"A good number of brands – mostly smaller brands with
eco positioning – are addressing chemical issues," Renouf says. "Most of the large
multinationals are addressing climate change and water issues, to some
degree. Large multinationals (L'Oréal, Unilever, Colgate, Kao and Johnson
& Johnson) tend to sell a wide range of products and perform more
strongly on climate change and water than they do on labour or the other
He says that few of the large multinationals are doing nothing, "but whether they are doing enough is debatable".
Labour rights issues ignored
Overall shampoo brands performed poorly on labour rights. Renouf says he
suspects that labour and poverty issues in the personal care industry are
much less in the public eye than in sectors like clothing, mining and food.
Animal testing in decline
Some good news is that globally there seems to be something of a shift happening when it comes to animal testing. This report found that a number of brands have never or no longer test on animals. For those that do, most state the only reason they continue to test on animals is because they sell products in
China where animal testing is mandatory. Currently in Australia while no animal testing for cosmetics currently takes place it's technically not illegal nor is the sale of any imported cosmetic products that have, or contain ingredients that have, been tested on animals elsewhere.
Also encouraging is that a bill is under consideration before the senate to enable a national ban which is expected to be rolled out later this year.
Alternatives to store-bought shampoo
If you think your preferred brands aren't doing enough on the ethical
front, contact them and let them know. In the meantime, if you're feeling
adventurous why not try putting that apple cider vinegar you bought for health reasons to good use on your hair instead?
Apple cider vinegar and baking soda are often touted as a low-toxicity,
low-cost alternative to store-bought shampoo – although some people report
it can be a little messy and baking soda can be tough on fragile hair.
If you're feeling even more adventurous you could consider not washing your
hair with anything at all."No poo" devotees ditch
detergent-based shampooing entirely and allow hair and scalp to return to a
natural balance of oils, where hair is occasionally rinsed with water or
Be warned though, this approach is not for the faint-hearted. Some people
report it can take up to 90 days before their hair gets used to the new
regime. During that time bad hair days may outnumber the good ones, but
plenty of practitioners who've got beyond those first few months swear by
"no poo" for healthy, shiny hair.