Save our consumer protections!

We need to stop the winding back of protections for consumers seeking financial advice.
Learn more

01 .#saveFOFA

The federal government is trying to axe important consumer protections, called the Future of Financial Advice reforms, or FoFA. 

These consumer protections came too late for some people, like Lyndi, whose story shows the devastating impact of bad financial advice. But now that we have these protections, we need to fight for them!

Financial advisers are supposed to help consumers make the right decisions to suit their needs, not push risky products that earn them bonuses. 

Consumers need trustworthy financial advice that works for them, not the banks. They also deserve not to have their futures eaten away by hidden fees.

CHOICE is campaigning to #saveFOFA - and you can help by signing up as a campaign supporter, or by printing out our #SaveFOFA poster, snapping a selfie then posting it on Facebook, Twitter or Instagram with the hashtag #SaveFOFA.


Sign up to our free

Receive FREE email updates of our latest tests, consumer news and CHOICE marketing promotions.


02.How could consumer protections have helped Lyndi?


The Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) protections were brought in to improve the quality of financial advice and build trust in the financial planning industry, in the wake of a series of high-profile scandals that saw consumers lose hundreds of millions of dollars.

They did not become mandatory until 1 July 2013, too late to help Lyndi. 

FoFA gave consumers seeking financial advice significantly stronger protections, enforced through the corporate regulator. 

Now the government is seeking to axe many of these protections, by proposing changes that will:

  • water down the obligation that an adviser must act in the client’s best interest
  • allow advisers to bypass the obligation to act in their client’s best interests when scoping what will be included in advice
  • add extra exemptions that will allow advisers to place their own or their employers’ interests ahead of their clients when recommending certain products, like general insurance
  • add extra exemptions on conflicted remuneration that will reinvigorate a sales-driven culture in financial advice, encouraging mis-selling
  • remove the obligation to communicate costs to all clients through annual statements
  • remove the protection that clients must opt-in to ongoing advice every two years, which stops people paying for ongoing advice they no longer require. 

People like Lyndi are significantly better off under the current law. We are calling on all federal politicians to put Australian consumers first and stand by our consumer protections. 

Your say - Choice voice

Make a Comment

Members – Sign in on the top right to contribute to comments